| Sort By:
For me, Washington & Lee was more damaging than helpful. With few exceptions, I would recommend against going to W&L. Keep in mind that once you go, you cannot transfer out.|
If you earn a degree from there, you will need to get a graduate degree to get some recognition. The reputation is always expressed in terms of a good "small, liberal arts college." Without that qualifier, it cannot compete.
In the 1980s, I found it to be an odd school. It was both small, exceedingly impersonal, and clique-ish. The professors and the administration were not particularly interested in teaching or communicating with students. The class size was small, but that does not mean the professors took a personal interest in their work. They did not.
The school had limited resources. To describe it as a university rather than a college is a stretch. I think most students would find it academically limited. The Commerce School was more a vocational school. It did not have the resources for anyone interested in accounting or finance. The sciences were weak, but that is acceptable. At W&L, you were either pre-med or you needed to get your degree elsewhere.
It is an odd place. It is also a lonely place.
In my opinion, it is not worth $35,000 a year.
My review may be out of date as well, but I would encourage students to seek out and ask W&L alumni from the late 70s and 80s. I would also ask more recent graduates, because, honestly, the school may have improved.
|Apr 17 2011|| Alumnus Male --
Class 2000 |
| W&L: is and amazing experience. If you can get in, you should go. You'll get a wonderful education both in the world of academia and you'll probably learn how to survive in any social setting you're ever placed in somewhere in the future. If you can make it through the Greek system, you're set for life. |
|Feb 07 2005|| 4th Year Female --
Class 2004 |
| Even though I graduated twenty years ago, I feel it's important to address the notion expressed by some on this site that a W&L diploma can't open doors in terms of admittance to graduate school or to one's desired level in the workforce. When I graduated, W&L wasn't even ranked as highly as it is now, and yet I was accepted into a graduate program at William and Mary -- my first choice and, I believe, a school everyone will agree is considered excellent. Nor do I remember my peers from my class or those classes above and below me having trouble with acceptance to the graduate programs of their choice. Depending upon the region of the country and -- as with any situation -- how much a prospective employer keeps up with schools other than the obviously well-known ones, W&L graduates might be frustrated by a lack of knowledge about their alma mater. I personally didn't encounter that, however, even though my first job was above the Mason-Dixon line. And even here in New England, I run into people all the time who are aware of W&L and its good reputation; people who take an interest in academics will know about all of the small, good schools. |
I'll also add that I attended a boarding school that routinely sends its students to the country's top colleges, so I have many friends who went to Harvard, Princeton, Yale and the like. They make no bones about the fact that it sounds as if I needed to work harder at W&L. The theory goes that it's extremely hard to get into a place like Harvard, but not so hard (and sometimes embarrassingly easy) to gain a diploma. A dear friend of mine who went to Princeton said even the requirement that every senior write an honors thesis was no guarantee that Princeton students have to work hard; she said her thesis experience was "a joke". So as long as W&L's professors are as accessible as they were in my time (and is roll still taken in some classes?), W&L students can expect the kind of experience they should have, in which they are taught by qualified scholars (not TA's) who are more interested in helping to expand young minds rather than merely growing their list of published materials. There were no non-participatory lectures when I attended W&L, nor was there grade inflation that I was aware of, and students were expected -- or even required --to attend class regularly. We were even given pop quizzes at times. Given my math and science grades at boarding school, I would not have been admitted to Ivy League schools, but the good news is that I didn't want to attend them anyway. I'd visited older friends at those schools and didn't find the environment to be my idea of traditionally collegiate. I applied early to W&L when I probably (especially in that day and age, before the tremendous surge in college applicants) would have been accepted to colleges that are nationally and even internationally well-known. And yet I received what I deem to be an excellent education.
A word about W&L's social structure, even though I'm "old". It appears to be quite similar to when I attended, and prospective students are definitely advised to stay overnight or at least spend a full day on campus when considering applying to the school. Of course, that really goes for any school, but perhaps is even more important when the school in question is small and close-to-homogenous. I knew what I was getting into and I had a great experience, arriving at the school already "preppy" and not having an interest in places where demonstrations occur(though I am hardly apathetic politically) or where I felt that I would be a "number". I also wanted a small-town environment. I made life-long friends and enjoyed cordial aquaintanceships with most of the student body. Were there aspects about the social scene at W&L that didn't thrill me? Yes, but overall I was very happy.So there's my story. Again, investigate thoroughly all colleges you intend to apply to!
|Aug 29 2011|| Alumna Female --
Class 2000 |