Mark a survey and Inform Staff
Please do not overuse -- this is just intended to notify SR staff of probably invalid surveys. We will not "edit" or censor existing valid surveys.
| Existing Review Notes: Administration: Peer Review:
Statistical Analyzer: |
| Survey (Identifying information hidden.) |
ACT: AcademicSuccess: Again: Attitude: Competitive: Creativity: ExCuricular: FAttitude1: FAttitude2: FAttitude3: FAttitude4: FAttitude5: FAttitude6: FacultyAcc: Friendly: FromArea: FundingUse: Gender: GradYear: Grounds: Intellect: Maint: MindExpect: MindUse: Programs: SAT: SAttitude1: SAttitude2: SAttitude3: SAttitude4: SAttitude5: SAttitude6: SAttitude7: SAttitude8: Safety: Social: Standing: SurroundingCity: TAclasses: USE_THIS_DATA: Usefulwork: Worth: Valid Email Address I can't speak for the UMUC CONUS program or the UMUC Asian program, but the European program serving the military is a disaster area. The amount of poor advising, poor program development, and errors with student records is substantial. Personnel at large installations have a greater choice of the same courses taught by the same instructors. Personnel at smaller installations get a few unnecessary courses to choose from. I think the overall problem is the management in Heidelberg do not communicate with one another, or with students very well. Overall, it's a sad program that is poorly managed. Advice: Do not enroll at UMUC Europe. |
