Mark a survey and Inform Staff
Please do not overuse -- this is just intended to notify SR staff of probably invalid surveys. We will not "edit" or censor existing valid surveys.
| Existing Review Notes: Administration: Peer Review:
Statistical Analyzer: |
| Survey (Identifying information hidden.) |
ADKEY: Anywhere: Charac: ContactOk: Csalary: Gender: GoingWell: HigherED: Intelligence: Motivation: Position1: Position2: Position3: Position4: Position5: Position6: Preparedness: Professional: Relevance: Reputation: ReviewLevel: Satisfied: Ssalary: StartingJob: StillInField: UContrib1: UContrib2: UContrib3: UContrib4: WhereURNow1: WhereURNow2: WhereURNow3: WhereURNow4: WhereURNow5: WhereURNow6: WhereURNow7: WhereURNow8: Year: No/invalid Email Address left Most important, even though the MSEL is a fully accredited graduate program, VLS is a Law School first and foremost and therefore graduate students are treated as second class students not good enough for law school. I chose VLS over other programs because of their reputation as leaders in environmental laws and policies. Unbeknownst to me that I would have to complete ABA law courses with second and third year law students(Why don't MSELs have their own classes???). Thus, there was a very steep learning curve- and only 1 exam for the entire semester (this and solely this was responsible for one's final grade). In hindsight, I should have accepted admittance to a regular thesis required policy graduate program- the playing field is more level there. Nonetheless, the program has potential, but only if the MSEL program identifies itself as unique outside of the law program. I wouldn't suggest that potential policy students apply to VLS, unless one does not care to be in a nontraditional graduate program with an unfair disadvantage. The MSEL loser jokes grow stale very fast in SoRo's tiny community. |
