StudentsReview ™ :: Mark a survey Invalid or inform SR staff

-or-
Search for Colleges by Region
 

or within distance of city





  Who's got the Best (variable)?

Perceptual Rankings:
You Make 'Em.
We Post 'Em.
You Vote 'Em Up.
You Vote 'Em Down.
Aww yeah.


Mark a survey and Inform Staff

Please do not overuse -- this is just intended to notify SR staff of probably invalid surveys. We will not "edit" or censor existing valid surveys.

This Survey/Comment is:
Valid
Invalid
Wrong location/Incorrect School
None of the above
Mark all that apply:
Content Nonsensical
Content Useless
Duplicate Survey
High Vulgarity
High Grammatical Error
Malicious Intent/Faked
Probably Admissions
SPAM
Added notes (max 100 chars):

Please remember that all surveys, even vulgar ones or those with poor grammar, convey something about the student body and the institution.

 
Existing Review Notes:
Administration:

Peer Review:
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1

Statistical Analyzer:

 
Survey (Identifying information hidden.)
ACT:
AcademicSuccess: 6.92
Again:
Attitude:
Competitive: 0.77
Creativity: 10.00
ExCuricular: 10.00
FAttitude1:
FAttitude2:
FAttitude3:
FAttitude4:
FAttitude5:
FAttitude6:
FacultyAcc: 10.00
Friendly: 10.00
FromArea: 1
FundingUse: 0.77
Gender: 1
GradYear: 14
Grounds: 0.77
Intellect: 1
Maint: 10.00
MindExpect: 2
MindUse: 1
Programs: 0.77
SAT:
SAttitude1:
SAttitude2:
SAttitude3: 1
SAttitude4:
SAttitude5:
SAttitude6:
SAttitude7: 1
SAttitude8: 1
Safety: 3.08
Social: 5.38
Standing: 3
SurroundingCity: 0.77
TAclasses: 2
USE_THIS_DATA: 1
Usefulwork: 3.85
Worth: 6.92
No/invalid Email Address left

The 'open-minded, global citizen' attitude that UofW attempts to harbour is absurd. 'Open-minded' to people who agree with their hippie hypocrasy, closed minded to anyone with an ounce of critical thinking ability.

in classes involving history the first few classes are always, without fail, about objectivity, cultural relativity, anti-racism, and so on. These are all necessary things to learn, however the UofW disregards to put these terms into action in their course material and examinations. The best example i can note is the blatent villification of historic europeans, and the illogical glamourization of non-european cultures.

ill note some examples of this anti-european perspective below

  • European Colonialists + Individuals involved with Colonial slave trade referred to as: whites, white man, caucasians, and europeans interchangeably.
  • teaches that "Racism" was invented by "europeans" in the 16th century AD.
  • suspiciously fails to incorporate ANY history involving violence, human rights violations, etc of non-european cultures
  • Example of non-european glamourification: "New World Civilizations" class is only about the Art of specific cities through Central america. fails to teach in detail about captives, enslavement, genocide, inequality, child sacrifice, and so on. Everything these cultures do is "beautiful" or "symbolic" and was destroyed by the "Europeans"
  • I could go on far longer with a list of racial generalizations but i think these few are enough to portray what i have noticed. beyond the bias in the material, the university is located in the heart of downtown, AKA alcoholic homeless heaven. being at the university past 11AM is awful because of all the disgusting downtown people wandering around begging for change. after 3 years at this university it is clear that these terms only apply to non-white individuals.

    StudentsReview Advice!

    • What is a good school?
    • Statistical Significance
    • How to choose a Major
    • How to choose your Career
    • What you make of it?
    • How Ivy League Admissions works
    • On the Student/Faculty Ratio

    • FAFSA: Who is a Parent?
    • FAFSA: Parent Contribution
    • FAFSA: Dream out of reach

    • College Financial Planning
    • Survive College and Graduate
    • Sniffing Out Commuter Schools
    • Preparing for College: A HS Roadmap
    • Talking to Your Parents about College.
    • Is a top college worth it?
    • Why is college hard?
    • Why Kids Aren't Happy in Traditional Schools