Harvard University (StudentsReview) -

Submit Quick Review	Quick overview survey. Mostly comment.
Review Cheryl Vaughan	Better survey, only slightly longer.

Professor Cheryl Vaughan
Harvard University

Overall

D+

7 ratings, [AVG: 53697 min, 46 sec]

Workload: Easy/None

Responsible Grading:

Enjoys Teaching

Arrogance:

Extreme

Speaks & Writes Clearly

D+

Respect for Students:

None

Sensible Lectures

Appreciates Creativity:

Hates it

Organized course

D+

Student Feedback is:

Ignored

Instructor Effort

Coursework:

Mostly "training"

Grading System:

Arbitrary

Course Requirements:

Unclear or random

Assignment Instructions

Unclear or Misleading

Exam Design:

Designed to trick

Exam Coverage:

Unknown or Unclear

Grades Reflect:

Nothing; no meaning at all

Final Grade Verification:

Grade is grade - no change

Gets class involved

C-

Competent with material

Friendly/Sociable

Adds to content

This instructor is: Strongly Disliked

Courses:
BIO E-30
NSCIE-100

Comments

Overall: F

Boring initially, but over time, it more closely resembles an exercise in futility. She seemed to be targeting the most brilliant students in the room (indicated by GRE scores, prestigious academic/intellectual memberships, & occupation) by assigning extra work to them so she could force them to drop out(emailing frequent hints to that effect to wear down these students); leaving only the most “agreeable” to enter the Master's program to which she holds the keys (and she never lets you forget it!). I did not learn anything I did not already know about the actual subject matter. I found her arrogance overbearing, comments patronizing, and I was very disappointed with her zest for bullying as she gleefully took every opportunity to inflict greater harm on struggling students, rather than helping them as any high-quality professional would. External perfection coupled with internal vacancy amounts to a winning combination in her book. More energy is invested in avoiding her emotional triggers than learning the material! When students are forced to spend every waking moment completing assignments for her (neglecting other courses and responsibilities), there is a problem. When students who can barely string together the most basic concepts pass every assignment while those with exemplary credentials fall short of earning a D-, a situation exists which threatens the integrity of the entire MLA program. Such nastiness is virtually unheard of at this particular top-tier institution and does not reflect what students in other courses can expect. This is an excellent school with one bad instructor— it happens. The instructor is apparently oblivious to the animosity she solicits from her students. Several classmates burst into tears while discussing the overwhelming workload and unreasonable expectations and these are students who are accustomed to rigorous academic programs!

Student Competency: Unusually High
Student's Grade: F
Liked Instructor?: Strongly Disliked

Overall: C-

Assignments and deadlines for graduate students were very reasonable. However, a large rift developed between students familiar who had worked in molecular biology labs and those who didn't. As mentioned previously, prior, detailed knowledge of epigenetic research techniques should have been listed as a prerequisite. Most of these techniques were glossed over in the text book and explained in an extremely fast, brief manner during lecture. Partial understanding or any creative manipulation of subject manner beyong the rote was denied partial credit.

Student Competency: Average
Student's Grade: C
Liked Instructor?: Disliked

Overall: F

Boring, confusing, misleading.

Student Competency: Unusually High
Student's Grade: C
Liked Instructor?: Strongly Disliked

Overall: F

This class taught me to avoid Cheryl Vaughan, and she's the only cruel and horrible professor at Harvard that I know of.

Student Competency: Average
Student's Grade: C-
Liked Instructor?: Strongly Disliked

Overall: F

The professor points people out in class and purposely makes them feel bad. For example, on one instance a student showed up to class late and later asked a question, she pointed out that the student was late for class and told the student to ask her outside or after class. Cheryl Vaughan seems irritated and defensive when asked a question that she does not know the answer to. I observed many instances where she cut people off when they were asking questions or were commenting about a particular topic. Perhaps she felt insecure and needed to change people's questions or comments to answer her own questions and make her own comments to appear competent. She openly shows who her favorites are and who are not. Cheryl Vaughan doesn't seem to want the people she doesn't like to succeed and wants to make sure that everybody else in the class knows it as well; she talks down on struggling students and points them out in class. I witnessed an instance where Cheryl Vaughan discussed a student's exam in class and urged that person to drop the class. In all my years of academic life I have never witnessed such unprofessionalism! I did not learn much from the course, because I was distracted by her cruelty and constant interruptions. She is a cold and unapproachable woman.

Student Competency: Average
Student's Grade: B
Liked Instructor?: Disliked

Similar Schools:

Yale University -- New Haven, CT

Princeton University -- Princeton, NJ

Stanford University -- Stanford, CA