(WISC-Madison) It seems somewhat overgeneral to classify

How this student rated the school

Research Quality	F	Research Availability	B
Research Funding	C	Graduate Politics	B
Errand Runners	B	Degree Completion	C+
Alternative pay [ta/gsi]	A	Sufficient Pay	B+
Competitiveness	B+	Education Quality	A-
Faculty Accessibility	A	Useful Research	A
Extracurriculars	A-	Success-Understanding	B+
Surrounding City	A	Social Life/Environment	B
"Individual" treatment	A-	Friendliness	B
Safety	B+	Campus Beauty	B
Campus Maintenance	B-	University Resource/spending	B

Describes the student body as: Friendly, Approachable Describes the faculty as: Friendly, Helpful

Male

GRE1350

Lowest Rating Research Quality	F

Highest Rating Alternative pay [ta/gsi]	A

He cares more about Research Quality than the average student.

Date: Dec 31 1969
Major: English (This Major's Salary over time)
It seems somewhat overgeneral to classify "students" or "faculty" as one thing or another. there are nice people here and there are not so nice people here. in general, my experience has been largely positive but there are things about this university that leave me with a bad taste in my mouth as well. probably this would be true just about anywhere I went. one nice thing about this university, if this appeals to you at all, is the vibrant athletic scene—it's great to have sports events to go to that are competitive and fun. the big university atmosphere is definitely a part of this campus.

Ask a Question or add a response!