(OU/UOklahoma-Norman) It is important to know that one's experience in

How this student rated the school

Research Quality	C	Research Availability	C
Research Funding	F	Graduate Politics	C-
Errand Runners	B-	Degree Completion	-
Alternative pay [ta/gsi]	F	Sufficient Pay	F
Competitiveness	D	Education Quality	D-
Faculty Accessibility	D-	Useful Research	D-
Extracurriculars	C+	Success-Understanding	D-
Surrounding City	C+	Social Life/Environment	C
"Individual" treatment	F	Friendliness	D-
Safety	B	Campus Beauty	B+
Campus Maintenance	C	University Resource/spending	F

Describes the student body as: Friendly, Approachable Describes the faculty as: Friendly, Self Absorbed

Male

Lowest Rating Research Funding	F

Highest Rating Campus Beauty	B+

He cares more about Faculty Accessibility than the average student.

Date: Dec 31 1969
Major: Fine Arts - Painting/Sculpture/Photography/etc (This Major's Salary over time)
It is important to know that one's experience in a graduate level program is just that. One experience varies from another and is not neccesarily a direct correlation to the over all quality of the school. That being said, I did not find my experience to be all that I had hoped for. Profs seemingly have the best of intentions, but it is not a rarity to have a meeting with a faculty member only to have them not show up without any reason to speak of. If you are under the impression that you will recieve financial aid or a TA position as a reward for a high gpa, forget it. It doesn't seem to work that way. The dept. is rather under-funded (through no fault of the "leadership" ie, dean or dept. head).

Ask a Question or add a response!