(Clarkson) although clarkson claims it is good, it is really

How this student rated the school

Educational Quality	D-	Faculty Accessibility	D-
Useful Schoolwork	D-	Excess Competition	D-
Academic Success	D-	Creativity/ Innovation	D-
Individual Value	D-	University Resource Use	D-
Campus Aesthetics/ Beauty	D-	Friendliness	D-
Campus Maintenance	D-	Social Life	D-
Surrounding City	D-	Extra Curriculars	D-
Safety	D-

Describes the student body as: Closeminded Describes the faculty as: Self Absorbed

Female

Quite Bright

Lowest Rating Educational Quality	D-

Highest Rating Educational Quality	D-

She cares more about Safety than the average student.

Date: Apr 03 2009
Major: Civil Engineering (This Major's Salary over time)
although clarkson claims it is good, it is really unimpressed. the classrooms, the labs and the equipment are sub par, not worth our tuitions at all. it hires quite a few awful faculty from poor eastern european countries, which are former communist countries. it is hard for clarkson to get fundings and donations because of its floppy reputation and image. i should have gone to rpi. don't trust clarkson's ads - they are lies. the coursework are pretty easy and loose. I got almostly all A's and a 3.9 GPA, but I know I could not make it at all at a prestigious university. by the way, norther new york totall sucks. incidentally, the transit, weather and food here are also significant disadvantages.

Ask a Question or add a response!