(Prescott) Don't know how it works at other schools, but

How this student rated the school

Research Quality	C-	Research Availability	D-
Research Funding	F	Graduate Politics	D
Errand Runners	D	Degree Completion	-
Alternative pay [ta/gsi]	D-	Sufficient Pay	F
Competitiveness	C-	Education Quality	F
Faculty Accessibility	F	Useful Research	B+
Extracurriculars	F	Success-Understanding	C
Surrounding City	C	Social Life/Environment	F
"Individual" treatment	C-	Friendliness	F
Safety	C-	Campus Beauty	F
Campus Maintenance	F	University Resource/spending	D

Describes the student body as: Friendly Describes the faculty as: Unhelpful, Self Absorbed

Male

Lowest Rating Research Funding	F

Highest Rating Useful Research	B+

He cares more about Education Quality than the average student.

Date: Dec 31 1969
Major: Education (This Major's Salary over time)
Don't know how it works at other schools, but here a grad student has two main contacts on staff, their adviser and their core faculty. The involvement of both is essential to student success. in my case, I am lucky, in that my adviser is active, interested and involved. the same can not be said of my core faculty member, who rarely returns calls or emails, even when time is an issue. i have often had to wait for over a month to get simple answers or basic feedback, if they come at all, and know of times when this person would pass the buck on to someone else, after being slack, and telling that person that "this needs to be done ASAP". everyone i know who has to deal with this person has the exact same complaint.

Ask a Question or add a response!