(Emmanuel) This was a very negative graduate experience for me

How this student rated the school

Research Quality	F	Research Availability	F
Research Funding	F	Graduate Politics	F
Errand Runners	F	Degree Completion	F
Alternative pay [ta/gsi]	F	Sufficient Pay	F
Competitiveness	F	Education Quality	F
Faculty Accessibility	F	Useful Research	F
Extracurriculars	-	Success-Understanding	-
Surrounding City	-	Social Life/Environment	-
"Individual" treatment	C+	Friendliness	C+
Safety	A	Campus Beauty	B
Campus Maintenance	A-	University Resource/spending	B

Describes the student body as: Broken Spirit Describes the faculty as: Unhelpful

Male

Lowest Rating Research Quality	F

Highest Rating Safety	A

He cares more about Competitiveness than the average student.

Date: Dec 31 1969
Major: Business - Management and Administration (This Major's Salary over time)
This was a very negative graduate experience for me. I found the education and class room time poorly organized. At times the professor would end class an hour early. I honestly believe they did not know what to do with the class time available. The class exercises were almost elementary. The school recommended a student put in 15 - 20 hours of homework each week, I did a fraction of that and got A's before dropping the program. Again, no educational value and I learned very, very little in this program. If ever I should be refunded for a poor product this is it.

Ask a Question or add a response!