National University
StudentsReview ::
National University - Extra Detail about the Comment | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Research Quality | C+ | Research Availability | B+ |
Research Funding | B+ | Graduate Politics | A- |
Errand Runners | A | Degree Completion | B+ |
Alternative pay [ta/gsi] | B | Sufficient Pay | A- |
Competitiveness | A- | Education Quality | A |
Faculty Accessibility | A+ | Useful Research | B+ |
Extracurriculars | - | Success-Understanding | A |
Surrounding City | - | Social Life/Environment | - |
"Individual" treatment | A+ | Friendliness | A+ |
Safety | - | Campus Beauty | - |
Campus Maintenance | - | University Resource/spending | A+ |
Describes the student body as: Friendly, ApproachableDescribes the faculty as: Friendly, Helpful |
Lowest Rating Research Quality | C+ |
Highest Rating Faculty Accessibility | A+ |
Major: Psychology (This Major's Salary over time)
I was quite surprised at the level of challenge I've faced with this curriculum thus far. One month = one course. It's a whirlwind, but I'm learning a lot and honing my skills as a writer and researcher. The academic rigor is excellent, so if you're looking for something easy, you're wasting valuable time and money. One of the best aspects of this school is the faculty and staff. Top to bottom, from admin to instructors, these people are among the most responsive I've ever seen from a sheer customer oriented perspective. Not what one expects from a not-for-profit. Intelligent and experienced faculty answer emails quite thoughtfully, all hours of the night and seven days a week, while even the admin advisors do the same. The only shortfall is I really think they should be more selective with admissions. I see some very clear indications that many of my cohorts just aren't prepared for this level of academic engagement. It's tragic, really, to think about what they seem to be wasting on apparent failure.