The School of Visual Arts
The School of Visual Arts - Extra Detail about the Comment|
|Educational Quality||A||Faculty Accessibility||A|
|Useful Schoolwork||A||Excess Competition||A|
|Academic Success||A-||Creativity/ Innovation||A|
|Individual Value||A+||University Resource Use||A+|
|Campus Aesthetics/ Beauty||B||Friendliness||A|
|Campus Maintenance||A||Social Life||A|
|Surrounding City||A+||Extra Curriculars||A|
|Describes the student body as:|
Friendly, Afraid, Arrogant, Broken Spirit, SnootyDescribes the faculty as:
Friendly, Helpful, Arrogant, Self Absorbed
Campus Aesthetics/ Beauty
|Do you actually attend SVA? You refer to the chairman of fine arts as "he." Just curious, what is "his" name?|
|I never said fine arts, I'm a photography major and his name is Stephen Frailey.|
|Then you should have stated that you are in photography.|
The complaints are from students in the Fine Arts program, not photography.
Digital Photography has a fantastic chair, Katrin Eismann.
Unfortunately, the new Fine Arts chair, Suzanne Anker, isn't well liked, so I hear.
|There is No way to select just Photography seeing as all of them are categorized as one. None the less- the school needs positive reviews and not such a negative outlook. SVA is one of the top schools in the country for Photography that's one of the reasons I picked SVA. If I was going for fine arts id choose Parsons. People need to take responsibility for their own actions and decisions without blaming everyone else.|