(Capella) DO NOT GO TO Capella Univeristy I was given

How this student rated the school

Research Quality	F	Research Availability	F
Research Funding	F	Graduate Politics	F
Errand Runners	F	Degree Completion	F
Alternative pay [ta/gsi]	F	Sufficient Pay	F
Competitiveness	F	Education Quality	F
Faculty Accessibility	F	Useful Research	F
Extracurriculars	F	Success-Understanding	F
Surrounding City	F	Social Life/Environment	F
"Individual" treatment	F	Friendliness	F
Safety	F	Campus Beauty	F
Campus Maintenance	F	University Resource/spending	F

Describes the student body as: Broken Spirit Describes the faculty as: Arrogant, Condescending, Unhelpful, Self Absorbed

Male

Lowest Rating Research Quality	F

Highest Rating Research Quality	F

He cares more about Friendliness than the average student.

Date: Dec 31 1969
Major: School of Information (This Major's Salary over time)
DO NOT GO TO Capella Univeristy I was given very bad information and all though I took ever single class these classes were horrible and when I was getting ready to do the dissertation they told me I was unable to submit since I took the classes in the wrong order. All they care about is money. I spent 7 years (15 classes before you are allowed to take dissertation classes and then 10 classes repeated which take 3 more years to complete). So you take 15 classes to be given access to dissertation then 13 classes to write one paper 10 of which are the same class. DO NOT GO TO CAPELLA! $80,000+ waste. The degree is worthless even if they let me obtain it.

Responses

It seems to me that your atrocious spelling and grammar is the real reason you didn't succeed. "All though I took ever single class"…seriously?!? You think you deserve to be a doctoral candidate when you write and spell that poorly?

TIME TO GET CAPELLA UNIVERSITY SHUT DOWN & THE SCUM BAG "LEADERSHIP" TO PAY! Refer to this site (although in 2010), as it MAY BE able to HELP YOU!

November 05, 2010 11:06 AM (EDT)—BOCA RATON, FLORIDA -(BUSINESS WIRE)—Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (“Robbins Geller”) ( today announced that a class action has been commenced on behalf of an institutional investor in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota on behalf of purchasers of the common stock of Capella Education Company (“Capella” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: CPLA) between February 16, 2010 and August 13, 2010, inclusive (the “Class Period”), seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business and financial results. Specifically, defendants failed to disclose that: (i) the Company had engaged in improper and deceptive recruiting and financial aid lending practices and, due to the government’s scrutiny into the for-profit education sector, the Company would be unable to continue these practices in the future; (ii) the Company failed to maintain proper internal controls; (iii) many of the Company’s programs were in jeopardy of losing their eligibility for federal financial aid; and (iv) as a result of the foregoing, defendants’ statements regarding the Company’s financial performance and expected earnings were false and misleading and lacked a reasonable basis when made.

On August 13, 2010, after the market closed, the U.S. Department of Education released data on federal student-loan repayment rates at the nation’s colleges and universities. The data showed that repayment rates were 54% at public colleges and 56% at private non-profit institutions, compared to just 36% at for-profit colleges. Specifically, the data showed that the repayment rate at Capella was just 40%. On this news, the price of Capella stock dropped 13.19%, or $9.26 per share, from a closing price of $70.20 per share on August 13, 2010 to a closing price of $60.94 per share on August 16, 2010, the following trading day, on a 438% increase in trading volume.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of Capella common stock during the Class Period (the “Class”). The plaintiff is represented by Robbins Geller, which has expertise in prosecuting investor class actions and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud.
Robbins Geller, a 180-lawyer firm with offices in San Diego, San Francisco, New York, Boca Raton, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia and Atlanta, is active in major cases pending in federal and state courts throughout the United States and has taken a leading role in many important actions on behalf of defrauded investors, consumers, and companies, as well as victims of human rights violations. The Robbins Geller Web site ( has more information about the firm.

Ask a Question or add a response!