I
spent a solid four years at UArts and changed through
three different majors. This was not because of my own
indecisiveness, but instead is a testament of the poor quality
of many of the “majors” at the school. I began
as a Fine Arts major and was subsequently put through
“foundation” which is basically an entire year wherein you waste
your time so that everyone can be “on the same
page”. Foundation year is nothing but meaningless busywork that is
neither technically nor intellectually challenging. You do things that most
students who go to art school already know how to
do (i.e. “training” your hand to draw straight lines (I
kid you not) over and over again, painting in color
wheels and making square inch grayscales, cutting out pieces of
expensive drawing paper to make “shapes” which you then use
to do contour drawings of (just the outside shape)). On
top of this meaningless drivel, half of the Foundation floor
is filled with poor film students who are for some
reason forced to take part in something that has absolutely
NOTHING to do with their major (honestly, why does a
“writing for film/television” major need to know how to make
contour drawings?!) which ends up dragging out the class time
and progress because these unfortunate film students are trying to
do something they're not good at/have no desire to actually
DO. And this is just freshman year, mind you.
I then transferred to the Theater Design/Technology department, which was
wonderful (partially because of the extremely small class size (it
was a new major at the time and there was
a total of 13 people in the whole of the
major)). Nick Embree is a fabulous professional, if a little
bit hesitant in his teaching. This major was fun and
engaging and only partially filled with meaningless work (which include
finding photos in magazines which execute “good design”, really? what
are we, 10 years old?). The problem with the Theater
Tech major lies in their unrealistic expectations of their students.
Students must take both a Costume class (which consists of
sewing together props for the school's own productions and taking
orders from a somewhat bitchy woman who expects everyone to
know how to sew extensively) and the Shop class, where
you physically build the sets. These would be exciting and
fun classes to take were they treated like actual classes.
Instead, they're treated like internships. You're expected and even required
to work at these places on Saturdays, Sundays, and even
after school classes/early mornings before class. If you commute, there
is no hope of ever being able to complete these
classes. If you have a minor, or even try to
take more than the absolute minimum of liberal arts classes
(or, likewise, want to actually pass your classes), it's impossible.
Or at least, extremely difficult. As someone with an academic
scholarship to upkeep, the time spent building sets (which is
not, by the way, the concentration of major which I
wanted) resulted in a financial and emotional strain.
I then
transferred back to the College of Art and Design after
realizing that I missed doing actual artwork and didn't want
to sell my soul to pay for extra commute money.
I went into the Illustration Department because I was told
that they “actually teach you how to draw”. Which they
didn't.
In Illustration, you take an anatomy class with
one of the hardest screws to ever walk those
halls: Phyllis. In retrospect, she's actually my favorite professor. She's
hard as nails, has ridiculous expectations, has ZERO bedside manner
when it comes to critiques and requires that you spend
an arm and a leg for supplies you will probably
never use again (the woman requires that you do your
drawing homework on hot-press Arches watercolor paper. WATERCOLOR PAPER. Which
will run you about $5.60 a sheet and a sheet
will get you two nights of homework. You have homework
every day you have class which is twice a week.
Do the math). Phyllis will expect you to do double
the amount of class time for homework. So a 6-hour
class like her anatomy class will mean you have 12
hours of homework. And it's not 12 hours for some
indigent either, it's 12 hours of copying anatomy exactly from
an expensive textbook and having to know a ridiculous amount
of anatomical terms, functions, and ratios. I learned a lot
in her class, a lot more than any other class
I took, but I worked my ass off to learn
it and struggled in my other classes as a result.
I transferred to the Painting Department lastly (due mostly
because the illustration faculty found my work to not be
“stylized” enough and I was basically told that my realistic,
antiquity-inspired style had no market. lovely). The Painting floor is
the biggest sack of bullshit ever. The kids on that
floor are nothing but self-indulgent, elitists who do not possess
a shred of technical talent or skill but instead feel
compelled to bloat their artwork with lofty expressions of “intellectualism”
which results in poorly constructed “artwork” so soaked in pretentiousness
it's enough to make you gag. They are gossips without
an iota respect and lack the intelligence or sophistication to
actually make their work into anything even remotely resembling the
Masters they claim to draw inspiration from.
The faculty
on this floor is even worse. It was common for
one of my professors to make lewd remarks about my
looks and then giggle while staring at me. My color
studies teacher was a hack: she'd praise a piece which
was completed the night before in a matter of minutes
and then scorn someone who had worked for days. She
had favorites, clearly, and was prone to days of what
seemed like hormonal imbalance and irritability which she took out
on her students. The worst person on the painting floor
is, however, Stuart Elster.
This is a man who
has grown fat on his pretentiousness. There are truly no
words to describe the pompousness and inflated sense of superiority
that this man possesses. His syllabus reads like a parody
of everything snooty art-snobs are supposed to be (if I
still had it, I would scan and upload it somewhere.
It really is a hysterical portrait of a man who
needs to lay off the thesaurus and pull his head
from his ass). He frequently uses words like, “diaphanous” and
“effluvium” to describe artwork during critiques. He also has an
amazing ability to turn a critique into the complete slaughter
of an individual's self-esteem. He responds favourably to artwork like,
a rock sitting on a three-legged stool (which belongs to
the University and randomly floats around the painting floor), while
staring blankly at beautifully painted pieces before turning and saying
something along the lines of, “stop wasting my time”.
The school is designed to get you to spend as
much money as possible while teaching you little to nothing.
There are very few after school activities or clubs. The
fellow students are nice enough, but most of them seem
to be lacking a few brain cells. I mean, this
IS an institution for higher educational, right? Instead, the school
is filled with motivationally-challenged potheads who only do half of
the assignments and are not nearly as intellectually edgy (and
no, smoking outside the doors to every campus building with
a gauge in your ear and a septum piercing does
not qualify as edgy or stimulating. Tattoos are not indicative
of creativity or genius) as young people attending an art
school should be. The professors can be unusually cruel, even
for someone with a lot of confidence, and can easily
break the spirit of someone with a sensitive soul (which,
by all means, should be everyone there. It's an art
school, artists are renowned for being sensitive. That's why we
MAKE ART, because we are SENSITIVE to things other people
ARE NOT).
The only good thing about UArts is
the city: Philadelphia is amazing and I feel privileged to
have spent four years living there (even if I didn't
graduate).