Mark a survey and Inform Staff

Peer Review:
76.120.181.68:invalid:Content Nonsensical, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, :Somebody on a lark wrote this up. The professor's name is obviously fake. Moreover, faculty have commented publically that to ever get hired, the candidate's writing has to be brilliant all the time. One average paper and they're dead. Tenure depends in part on STUDENT RECOMMENDATIONS! . I've known faculty to beg a former student for a reference and not get it. The irreality of this review is just about perfect.
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1

Statistical Analyzer:

One thing I don't regret about PU is my class with prof Guido. He was the best teacher I have ever had and Princeton does have some good professors. however, sadly, most of them focus on research/publications and thus have very little time for undergrads. When Guido didn't get tenure, that was when I realized that Princeton cares more about success on paper than a really quality teacher. Guido didn't have great publications out like others, but did care about the students, unlike others. However, he was let go. This is characteristic of PU. They forget about you and only let you dance (philosophically speaking) with TAs. I wish I had gotten MORE ATTENTION like they say in la clase de espanol but in Spanish.