Mark a survey and Inform Staff
Please do not overuse -- this is just intended to notify SR staff of probably invalid surveys. We will not "edit" or censor existing valid surveys.
Existing Review Notes: Administration: Peer Review:
Statistical Analyzer: |
Survey (Identifying information hidden.) |
ACT: AcademicSuccess: Again: Attitude: Competitive: Creativity: ExCuricular: FAttitude1: FAttitude2: FAttitude3: FAttitude4: FAttitude5: FAttitude6: FacultyAcc: Friendly: FromArea: FundingUse: Gender: GradYear: Grounds: Intellect: Maint: MindExpect: MindUse: Programs: SAT: SAttitude1: SAttitude2: SAttitude3: SAttitude4: SAttitude5: SAttitude6: SAttitude7: SAttitude8: Safety: Social: Standing: SurroundingCity: TAclasses: USE_THIS_DATA: Usefulwork: Worth: No/invalid Email Address left On the exterior, the school is well maintained and very beautiful. On the interior, there are several strengths and also several weaknesses. One weakness is the fact that faculty advisors for prelaw majors are those who never attended law school. In fact, I asked my advisor if there was a class sequence that I should do. (I had been told by several SR students as well as the Course professor to take a Business Law class before it was scheduled.) The advisor told me he was not sure of it, but he thought it would be best if I stuck with the prescribed sequence. The point is that the advisor had no real idea what would be best for me to take. However, two of the professors for the program—Dr. John Reese and Dr. Bill Bowen—are outstanding and first class. Overall, the prelaw program is a quality program. The professors for the most part are well qualified (the key is picking the right ones) and most of the classes are pertinent.On a seperate note, a lot of the rules and regulations are retarded and are subject to the capricious whims of the administration. However, most students are not forced to attend—they choose to go and therfore choose to submit to the rules however dumb they are. |