StudentsReview ™ :: Mark a survey Invalid or inform SR staff

-or-
Search for Colleges by Region
 

or within distance of city





  Who's got the Best (variable)?

Perceptual Rankings:
You Make 'Em.
We Post 'Em.
You Vote 'Em Up.
You Vote 'Em Down.
Aww yeah.


Mark a survey and Inform Staff

Please do not overuse -- this is just intended to notify SR staff of probably invalid surveys. We will not "edit" or censor existing valid surveys.

This Survey/Comment is:
Valid
Invalid
Wrong location/Incorrect School
None of the above
Mark all that apply:
Content Nonsensical
Content Useless
Duplicate Survey
High Vulgarity
High Grammatical Error
Malicious Intent/Faked
Probably Admissions
SPAM
Added notes (max 100 chars):

Please remember that all surveys, even vulgar ones or those with poor grammar, convey something about the student body and the institution.

 
Existing Review Notes:
Administration:

Peer Review:
24.131.11.236:invalid:High Vulgarity, Malicious Intent/Faked, :innocent until prove guilty (by a jury)
152.3.158.54:invalid:Content Nonsensical, High Vulgarity, Malicious Intent/Faked, :irrelevant, highly false
76.102.27.209:invalid:Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, :lacrosse players were innocent. this does nothing but hurt Duke's reputation.
71.120.24.228:invalid:Content Nonsensical, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, :
69.134.122.183:invalid:Malicious Intent/Faked, :
65.1.152.96:invalid:Malicious Intent/Faked, :
66.57.43.80:invalid:Content Nonsensical, High Vulgarity, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, :response to lacrosse case; students shown to be innocent
128.138.171.51:invalid:Malicious Intent/Faked, :I'm pretty sure the fact that they D.A. was disbarred proved the innocence of all of the lacrosse players...
24.28.77.125:valid:Malicious Intent/Faked, :
98.101.111.224:invalid:High Vulgarity, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, :
72.203.148.178:invalid:Malicious Intent/Faked, :Based on the Duke lacrosse scandal, this review maligns the school over the purported actions of a few. Not only would this be an inappropriate, sweeping generalization in any case, but the quality of the review is worsened by the fact that the players were acquitted.
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1

Statistical Analyzer: DUPLICATE,INCONSISTENT,VARIANCE,,BLANK_SURVEY_NODATA

 
Survey (Identifying information hidden.)
ACT:
AcademicSuccess: 0.77
Again: 1
Attitude:
Competitive: 0.77
Creativity: 0.77
ExCuricular: 0.77
FAttitude1:
FAttitude2:
FAttitude3:
FAttitude4:
FAttitude5:
FAttitude6:
FacultyAcc: 0.77
Friendly: 0.77
FromArea: 3
FundingUse: 0.77
Gender:
GradYear: 8
Grounds: 0.77
Intellect: 1
Maint: 0.77
MindExpect: 1
MindUse: 1
Programs: 0.77
SAT:
SAttitude1:
SAttitude2:
SAttitude3:
SAttitude4:
SAttitude5:
SAttitude6:
SAttitude7:
SAttitude8:
Safety: 0.77
Social: 0.77
Standing: 3
SurroundingCity: 0.77
TAclasses: 1
USE_THIS_DATA:
Usefulwork: 0.77
Worth: 0.77
No/invalid Email Address left

Are you a black female? Do you like being raped and beaten by rich white boys? Come to Duke:)

StudentsReview Advice!

• What is a good school?
• Statistical Significance
• How to choose a Major
• How to choose your Career
• What you make of it?
• How Ivy League Admissions works
• On the Student/Faculty Ratio

• FAFSA: Who is a Parent?
• FAFSA: Parent Contribution
• FAFSA: Dream out of reach

• College Financial Planning
• Survive College and Graduate
• Sniffing Out Commuter Schools
• Preparing for College: A HS Roadmap
• Talking to Your Parents about College.
• Is a top college worth it?
• Why is college hard?
• Why Kids Aren't Happy in Traditional Schools