StudentsReview ™ :: Mark a survey Invalid or inform SR staff

-or-
Search for Colleges by Region
 

or within distance of city





  Who's got the Best (variable)?

Perceptual Rankings:
You Make 'Em.
We Post 'Em.
You Vote 'Em Up.
You Vote 'Em Down.
Aww yeah.


Mark a survey and Inform Staff

Please do not overuse -- this is just intended to notify SR staff of probably invalid surveys. We will not "edit" or censor existing valid surveys.

This Survey/Comment is:
Valid
Invalid
Wrong location/Incorrect School
None of the above
Mark all that apply:
Content Nonsensical
Content Useless
Duplicate Survey
High Vulgarity
High Grammatical Error
Malicious Intent/Faked
Probably Admissions
SPAM
Added notes (max 100 chars):

Please remember that all surveys, even vulgar ones or those with poor grammar, convey something about the student body and the institution.

 
Existing Review Notes:
Administration:

Peer Review:
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1

Statistical Analyzer: ,BLANK_SURVEY_NODATA

 
Survey (Identifying information hidden.)
ACT:
AcademicSuccess: 0.77
Again:
Attitude:
Competitive: 0.77
Creativity: 0.77
ExCuricular: 0.77
FAttitude1:
FAttitude2:
FAttitude3: 1
FAttitude4: 1
FAttitude5: 1
FAttitude6: 1
FacultyAcc: 0.77
Friendly: 0.77
FromArea: 2
FundingUse: 0.77
Gender: 1
GradYear: 99
Grounds: 7.69
Intellect: 4
Maint: 7.69
MindExpect: 4
MindUse: 1
Programs: 0.77
SAT:
SAttitude1:
SAttitude2:
SAttitude3: 1
SAttitude4:
SAttitude5:
SAttitude6:
SAttitude7:
SAttitude8: 1
Safety: 6.92
Social: 0.77
Standing: 4
SurroundingCity: 0.77
TAclasses: 1
USE_THIS_DATA:
Usefulwork: 0.77
Worth: 0.77
No/invalid Email Address left

The school was not a challenge. I made the mistake of studying a social science and I found the coursework repetitive. The third and fourth year coursework intorduced the same topics of the second and first year in a manner that was repetitive, not advancing the topics. I didn't have to study and I got an A. While most universities go into more detail about applied subjects such as research method, reliability, validity, we were debating for six weeks why theorists like Freud must be respected as elders of the structure. Freud had no business in 400 level applications classes. However, their need to respect the status quo has polluted the coursework.

I did some internet searches and found that the textbooks they used in 300 and 400 level courses were often sold at community colleges. Professors repeated the introductory works of Weber, Durkeim, Comte, when they promised applied study. It made each course an easy A but it was frustrating not to learn anything. They kept promising these hard skills in the next set of courses and it will deliver the ability to do more than anyone. However, these hard skills were just not delivered.

The surrounding community is, at a minimum, extremely conservative. In order to interact, you must front two images. An initial public image delivered to everybody, and a private image that might challenge the status quo. The community fronts social demands that by most can be escaped with a mild agreement or the failure to reject the topic. Racism and discrimination are commonly justified by the community as there is a belief that they are keep the populus clean. If you are in any way different, don't go here. While the school makes a nice front for diversity, the community is not yet ready.

StudentsReview Advice!

• What is a good school?
• Statistical Significance
• How to choose a Major
• How to choose your Career
• What you make of it?
• How Ivy League Admissions works
• On the Student/Faculty Ratio

• FAFSA: Who is a Parent?
• FAFSA: Parent Contribution
• FAFSA: Dream out of reach

• College Financial Planning
• Survive College and Graduate
• Sniffing Out Commuter Schools
• Preparing for College: A HS Roadmap
• Talking to Your Parents about College.
• Is a top college worth it?
• Why is college hard?
• Why Kids Aren't Happy in Traditional Schools