Mark a survey and Inform Staff

Peer Review:
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1

Statistical Analyzer:

The Industrial Design program at the university of Cincinnati is intended to churn out acceptable interns for the supporting corporations and big name firms that use its coop system as a labor mill. There is no guidance on how to take those experiences and turn them into a respectable design position. Academically the program is lacking. We did not sit down and have a conversation about design theory until our senior (5th) year. Any attempts to deviate from their system (of creating good interns) is frowned upon and met with resistance. Post graduation I was told that they didn't think I exhibited the level of aptitude that a graduate of their program should portray (so why did they give me a degree? I obviously didn't earn it). They denied my request for a recommendation to graduate school. (good thing - I probably didn't want their recommendation if that was their view). At this point you may be thinking disenfranchised slacker student, that they shouldn't have graduated. That would be a fair conclusion, except that I'm now enrolled a very competitive and sought after masters program at Carnegie Mellon. If I have one take away from design school at UC, it is technical skills. I couldn't draw a stick figure when I showed up, and now I can draw a cube. As far as being a DESIGNER though - their advice always seemed to be

think outside the box, but don't think outside of OUR box.