Mark a survey and Inform Staff
Please do not overuse -- this is just intended to notify SR staff of probably invalid surveys. We will not "edit" or censor existing valid surveys.
Existing Review Notes: Administration: Peer Review:
Statistical Analyzer: DUPLICATE,INCONSISTENT,VARIANCE,,BLANK_SURVEY_NODATA |
Survey (Identifying information hidden.) |
ACT: AcademicSuccess: Again: Attitude: Competitive: Creativity: ExCuricular: FAttitude1: FAttitude2: FAttitude3: FAttitude4: FAttitude5: FAttitude6: FacultyAcc: Friendly: FromArea: FundingUse: Gender: GradYear: Grounds: Intellect: Maint: MindExpect: MindUse: Programs: SAT: SAttitude1: SAttitude2: SAttitude3: SAttitude4: SAttitude5: SAttitude6: SAttitude7: SAttitude8: Safety: Social: Standing: SurroundingCity: TAclasses: USE_THIS_DATA: Usefulwork: Worth: No/invalid Email Address left
The post under this was made by someone in the PR office. I'm a student worker there and I watched them type it in. Even if it were true (it's not), 75% of faculty (this is a mighty specific number, don't you think?) is very poor when compared to good schools that are in the 98% range. Also if 25% of the profs don't have Ph.D.'s, that means you ARE being taught by what are essentially graduate students. Oh yeah, there are no "challenging courses" here and the only reason your prof checks up on you is because most students are so poor, they would flunk out of any other university so theyve to got to make sure their cash cows stay around. Rigor? No. Things to do "all the time"? No. Good choice for anyone but the most country students who need to be handheld in order to make it through this creampuff school? No. |