Mark a survey and Inform Staff
Please do not overuse -- this is just intended to notify SR staff of probably invalid surveys. We will not "edit" or censor existing valid surveys.
Existing Review Notes: Administration: Peer Review: Statistical Analyzer: ,BLANK_SURVEY_NODATA |
Survey (Identifying information hidden.) |
ACT: AcademicSuccess: Again: Attitude: Competitive: Creativity: ExCuricular: FAttitude1: FAttitude2: FAttitude3: FAttitude4: FAttitude5: FAttitude6: FacultyAcc: Friendly: FromArea: FundingUse: Gender: GradYear: Grounds: Intellect: Maint: MindExpect: MindUse: Programs: SAT: SAttitude1: SAttitude2: SAttitude3: SAttitude4: SAttitude5: SAttitude6: SAttitude7: SAttitude8: Safety: Social: Standing: SurroundingCity: TAclasses: USE_THIS_DATA: Usefulwork: Worth: No/invalid Email Address left Their courses feel like they were put together in 2002 and the materials seem archaic. Instructors are old and lazy for the most part. Assignments not very interesting. I can think of only one outstanding professor in this department (Tyson). I suggest if you are serious about CS to avoid this program and instead do research on General Assembly, Code Academy, Hack Reactor and the like instead. It is my opinion that the CS department lacks vigor and dynamism and is not supportive or welcoming. |