Mark a survey and Inform Staff

Peer Review:
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammatical Error, Probably Admissions, Content Useless, Malicious Intent/Faked, SPAM, :1
5.45.80.218:valid:Content Nonsensical, Duplicate Survey, High Vulgarity, High Grammati

Statistical Analyzer:

The rules were never an issue while I was a student, so I don't have that as a complaint. I was there to get an education, not to party. Now that it has been 11 years since I graduated from PCC, I realize I missed out - not because I didn't get to do the partying, but because I was never afforded the opportunity to learn to think philosophically or hear what my fellow students thought. It was just lecture - test - lecture - test. No student input whatsoever.

When I first started graduate school, I was shocked when my professors wanted to know what I thought - no teacher ever cared about my opinion at PCC, just could I regurgitate material for an exam. I am now almost finished with my doctorate, and I do believe the school fostered in me a self-discipline other institutions might not have.

PCC faculty and administration continually criticized groups they referred to as pseudo-intellectuals and censored our reading materials, citing the verse that we should not think on such things. Anything written after the turn of the 20th century was viewed with suspicion by most people on campus. This is not the school to go to if you are looking forward to late nights discussing German philosophy or Postmodernism with your fellow students. For one, lights out is at 11, but most students aren't familiar enough with such topics upon arrival and certainly don't learn anything about them while there, other than their existence and that they are "bad."