(NC) A few classes were excellent, but a disproportionately high

How this student rated the school

Research Quality	-	Research Availability	-
Research Funding	-	Graduate Politics	C+
Errand Runners	-	Degree Completion	B+
Alternative pay [ta/gsi]	-	Sufficient Pay	-
Competitiveness	-	Education Quality	D
Faculty Accessibility	C+	Useful Research	-
Extracurriculars	C	Success-Understanding	B+
Surrounding City	A	Social Life/Environment	B-
"Individual" treatment	C+	Friendliness	B-
Safety	A	Campus Beauty	C
Campus Maintenance	C	University Resource/spending	C

Describes the student body as: Friendly, Broken Spirit Describes the faculty as: Helpful, Arrogant, Condescending, Unhelpful, Self Absorbed

Male

Lowest Rating Education Quality	D

Highest Rating Surrounding City	A

He rated most things higher than other students did.

Date: Dec 31 1969
Major: Psychology (This Major's Salary over time)
A few classes were excellent, but a disproportionately high number of classes were taught at a sub-par level. The class evaluations were a waste of paper because they are not used to make changes or decisions about teachers. Professors routinely fail to return assignments, and holding professors rsponsible for returning work becomes the student's chore. But the worst part is that the school professes to be radical in terms of its diversity and progressive politics, but then it hires professors who could easily be guests on Rush Limbaugh. It seems that the school is so busy patting itself on the back, it can't actually accurately assess how far it is falling from its own educational goals.

Ask a Question or add a response!