Columbia College - Chicago
| StudentsReview ::
Columbia College - Chicago - Graduate (MS/PhD) Ratings | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Total Grad Surveys | 4 |
| Females | 3 |
| Males | 1 |
| Avg years at University | 2.3 |
| Research Quality | F (0.8) |
| Research Availability | F (0.9) |
| Research Funding | F (0.8) |
| Graduate Politics | D- (1.3) |
| Not Errand Runners | D (2.0) |
| Degree Completion | |
| Alternative pay [ta/gsi] | F (0.8) |
| Sufficient Pay | F (0.8) |
| Competitiveness | D- (1.8) |
| Education Quality | F (0.8) |
| Faculty Accessibility | D+ (2.9) |
| Useful Research | D+ (2.9) |
| "Individual" treatment | F (0.8) |
| Friendliness | D+ (3.4) |
| Safety | C (4.4) |
| Campus Beauty | C- (3.6) |
| Campus Maintenance | C- (3.8) |
| University Spending | D- (1.2) |
| Extracurriculars | D (2.0) |
| Scholastic Success | D- (1.3) |
| Surrounding City | A+ (9.8) |
| Social Life/ Environment | C- (3.8) |
I thought that the only way to progress further as a filmmaker was to go back to graduate school and leverage the school's education with the equipment to make more movies. While I have accomplished some good things in this program and garnered awards for one of my films, I am choosing to leave because I can not in good conscious continue to support a system that hinders the creativity of its students and demeans them for wanting to excel above and beyond the very limited curriculum. Wenhwa Tsoa, the Director of the Graduate department actually told me that Columbia was not a "rental facility" when I requested to check out a camera I needed to record a workshop of a project I spent two years developing at Columbia.
I warn all future students that you can find much better programs online. The first year at Columbia was ok but it was a very step down hill from there. They entice you to stay with small scholarships the second year in the hope that you're too far invested into the program to leave before paying another full tuition for the 3rd year. There are a few phenomenal teachers like Karen Loop, Joe Steiff, Dan Rybicky, and Julian Grant. However, the bulk of the other teachers will openly admit they are more interested in utilizing the school's resources to make their own pet projects on the side. A problem that directly undercuts the resources that the graduate students are able to get access to.
The program plays favorites with the fellowship students they choose from the beginning. In my class, two fellowship students were on academic probation after the first semester and should have been asked to leave after the first year for repeated tardiness and absences. However, the graduate council made a special exception for these students to keep their scholarship money, stay in the program, and get special access to equipment or more grant money to fund their films.
The Graduate Director Wenhwa Tsoa is blatantly unprofessional. She sent a Kickstarter email to all the graduate students via a school email list requesting funding for a short film she directed through AFI's female director's program. Not only was this advertising another film program but she actually asked for money from students she has the power to hire, fire, grant equipment to, and grant fellowship funding for. It's hard enough for students to pay her salary via tuition let alone to pay for their own films which Columbia staff attempt curtail with endless limitations on equipment and resources. Wenhwa and other staff were allowed to use the Red camera on personal projects while that camera was denied to graduate students just the semester before. Graduate students had to share their 3rd year directing class with undergraduates that were given access to the Red camera while they were not. Wenhwa has continually saved herself the cost of childcare by bringing her preschool aged daughter to professional Columbia meetings. Several students were extremely distracted by her child when she brought her to a lecture by an experienced Hollywood Director. Although Wenhwa asked the children to remain quiet several times, she never removed them from the lecture because she wanted to enjoy it herself. It was extremely disrespectful to the professional who was attempting to lecture and the students who wanted to focus on the information.This is the kind of unprofessional disregard, the film department staff has for its hard working tuition paying graduate students. Do not make the mistake of attending this school. There are other options.
Are you a student and about to sign the very first lease in your li... more→
I had a full ride and free tuition and would not suggest it to anyone as I don't feel it was valuable even being free. The politics are toxic, there is no independent thought. Graduate students are not given independence and they are teaching based on the sceme of an industry from 25 years ago.STAY AWAY! There is a reason their enrollment has been declining for over a decade.