The Art Academy of Cincinnati
| StudentsReview ::
The Art Academy of Cincinnati - Extra Detail about the Comment | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Educational Quality | D+ | Faculty Accessibility | C+ |
| Useful Schoolwork | A- | Excess Competition | C |
| Academic Success | A- | Creativity/ Innovation | B- |
| Individual Value | B+ | University Resource Use | D- |
| Campus Aesthetics/ Beauty | A | Friendliness | C+ |
| Campus Maintenance | A+ | Social Life | F |
| Surrounding City | F | Extra Curriculars | F |
| Safety | C- | ||
| Describes the student body as: Arrogant, Broken Spirit, ClosemindedDescribes the faculty as: Condescending, Unhelpful, Self Absorbed | |||
| Lowest Rating Social Life | F |
| Highest Rating Campus Maintenance | A+ |
Major: Design Arts - Industrial Design/Graphic Design/etc (This Major's Salary over time)
This school,is very closedminded and despite the large number of communications arts students (graphic design or VCD, illustration, and photography) this field is almost entirely ignored or viewed unrealistically. Emphasis is not on gained employment post-school but on creating avant-garde fine art that confuses and insults the public. Internships are non-existent and if the students wishes to have one they must make their own connections. Technology at this school is a disaster. Printers are always down, or working at low quality, the technology assistant is insulting and condescending, and the school is still not wired after it's third year in the new building! I'm a good student who works very hard, yet I wonder if I'd have been better off going to another school. I wanted fine arts to influence my work, not smother it.