(AICAU-San Francisco) Pros: in the city of San Francisco, a couple

How this student rated the school

Educational Quality	F	Faculty Accessibility	D
Useful Schoolwork	D	Excess Competition	B
Academic Success	C-	Creativity/ Innovation	F
Individual Value	F	University Resource Use	F
Campus Aesthetics/ Beauty	F	Friendliness	F
Campus Maintenance	C	Social Life	F
Surrounding City	A-	Extra Curriculars	D
Safety	F

Describes the student body as: Friendly, Broken Spirit Describes the faculty as: Arrogant, Condescending, Unhelpful, Self Absorbed

Female

Quite Bright

Lowest Rating Educational Quality	F

Highest Rating Surrounding City	A-

She cares more about Creativity/ Innovation than the average student.

Date: Nov 09 2008
Major: Unknown (This Major's Salary over time)
Pros: in the city of San Francisco, a couple of instructors that actually take time to plan their classes and are respectful of students

Cons:

class structure not conducive to learning (4-hour classes that are only once a week; 2 out of the 4 hours are never productive since neither the students or instructors can pay attention that long; I had one instructor that consistently left 45 minutes early)

majority of instructors and staff are extremely condescending

systems are outdated—you have to register for class in person

cost is too high

print shop is worse than a trip to kinkos

school was reprimanded by a state senator for violating students' 1st amendment rights

classes are not taught at the college level (i'm sorry, but isn't long division something you're supposed to go over in grade school…?)

located in a rough part of town (where San Francisco's failures to provide human services and outreach, a decent police force and economic development all collide)

Advice: Avoid at all costs

Ask a Question or add a response!