Wright Institute
| StudentsReview ::
Wright Institute - Extra Detail about the Comment | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Educational Quality | A+ | Faculty Accessibility | A- |
| Useful Schoolwork | A | Excess Competition | A+ |
| Academic Success | A | Creativity/ Innovation | A- |
| Individual Value | A+ | University Resource Use | B+ |
| Campus Aesthetics/ Beauty | C | Friendliness | B+ |
| Campus Maintenance | A- | Social Life | A |
| Surrounding City | A+ | Extra Curriculars | C |
| Safety | B- | ||
| Describes the student body as: Friendly, ApproachableDescribes the faculty as: Friendly, Helpful | |||
| Lowest Rating Campus Aesthetics/ Beauty | C |
| Highest Rating Educational Quality | A+ |
There are 0 more!
Major: Psychology (This Major's Salary over time)
I am a very satisfied alum of the Wright Institute. The degree I received launched me onto a career path that has been very rewarding. I was in the original Social-Clinical Ph.D. program, and I had the chance to study under founder Nevitt Sanford as well as Charles Hampden-Turner, Stephen Pittel, Doris Gilbert, Phil Ratoosh and Richard Lichtman. This was a stellar of mostly Ivy League-trained professors who combined deep understanding of neo-Freudianism, object relations, personality, social and organizational psychology to provide us with a well-rounded education in psychology. I have gone on to a career as a consulting psychologist specializing in executive coaching and assessment, executive team alignment and leadership development. I am grateful to the Wright Institute for all it gave to me.