(GCU) I tried for an online PhD

How this student rated the school

Research Quality	F	Research Availability	F
Research Funding	-	Graduate Politics	C
Errand Runners	B	Degree Completion	F
Alternative pay [ta/gsi]	F	Sufficient Pay	-
Competitiveness	F	Education Quality	F
Faculty Accessibility	F	Useful Research	-
Extracurriculars	-	Success-Understanding	F
Surrounding City	-	Social Life/Environment	-
"Individual" treatment	F	Friendliness	F
Safety	F	Campus Beauty	-
Campus Maintenance	-	University Resource/spending	F

Describes the student body as: Afraid Describes the faculty as: Arrogant, Condescending, Unhelpful, Self Absorbed

Male

Lowest Rating Research Quality	F

Highest Rating Errand Runners	B

He cares more about Friendliness than the average student.

Date: Dec 31 1969
Major: Psychology (This Major's Salary over time)
I tried for an online PhD. Withrdrew before completing first class. Look it up online—there is NO Faculty Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics. There is no student grievance process. The only process they have is for Title IX (sexual complaints) because that is the fed law if they want to be eligible for funding. My instructor was, I think, starting to suffer from dementia. He was strange—but there was no way to voice a concern or elevate any problems. PhD in psychology program has also never graduated an online student. Look online, the board is all white male—not a problem in itself, but indicative of the culture (most university leadership at least has token diversity). Arrogant; avoid at all costs.

Ask a Question or add a response!