The City University of New York Hunter College
| StudentsReview ::
The City University of New York Hunter College - Graduate (MS/PhD) Ratings | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Total Grad Surveys | 7 |
| Females | 4 |
| Males | 3 |
| Avg years at University | 2.1 |
| Research Quality | B (6.7) |
| Research Availability | C+ (5.1) |
| Research Funding | C+ (5.1) |
| Graduate Politics | C (4.2) |
| Not Errand Runners | B+ (7.5) |
| Degree Completion | B (6.6) |
| Alternative pay [ta/gsi] | C- (3.9) |
| Sufficient Pay | C+ (5.4) |
| Competitiveness | B+ (7.4) |
| Education Quality | B (6.6) |
| Faculty Accessibility | B (6.5) |
| Useful Research | B (7.0) |
| "Individual" treatment | C (4.7) |
| Friendliness | C- (4.1) |
| Safety | A- (8.5) |
| Campus Beauty | C (4.4) |
| Campus Maintenance | C- (3.7) |
| University Spending | C- (4.2) |
| Extracurriculars | C (4.7) |
| Scholastic Success | B (7.0) |
| Surrounding City | A (8.9) |
| Social Life/ Environment | C- (3.7) |
The Hunter program is highly driven by politics and your ability to "brown nose." Getting accepted by the program does not guarantee you will stay in the program. The faculty work diligently to weed students out even into their second year of graduate studies (several students were approached by faculty to be told to consider changing career paths and turn towards special education and others were left to fall below average in their academic grades so as to have reason to have them leave the program). I was witness to unfair treatment and behaviors from the faculty towards students who were academically weaker than others or whom the faculty for one reason or another had singled out (some of those students were those who had integrity and did not brown nose).
Internship placements were unfairly distributed: preferred students (regardless of their academic performance) would be given the most prestigious placements over three consecutive semesters, even though other, better qualified and more deserving students were given mediocre placements time and time again. Students' personal preference or desire to gain experience working with certain populations were disregarded, except for the preferred students. When the clinic director was approached regarding this matter, he would not give a concise explanation for the disparity in internship opportunities.
Additionally, when students sent letters of complaint to the Dean of the Health Sciences school, they were either ignored or reprimanded for their complaints.
As a result of the negative political atmosphere that overwhelmed the program, students were bitterly competitive, although we were all working towards achieving the same goal, which in the end would lead all of us to becoming colleagues in the same field.Another negative of this program and a strong reason not to go to Hunter is the fact that students do not come out prepared to work in school settings/ with children ages 3 years and up in NY state, as the SLP program at Hunter College does not automatically place students on the track for the TSSLD. All the other programs in NYC automatically place students onto that track.
As with all things, Hunter has its plusses and its minuses On the plus side, you get experienced faculty—no TA’s here (at least on the grad level). And, compared to other CUNY “senior” colleges, Hunter allows you to structure your program with a little more flexibility. Best of all, compared to the cost of private colleges, Hunter is a bargain.
On the downside, for me, is an adherence to academic traditions that I find pointless in this day and age. This is the only school I have ever attended (or visited) where the faculty would like—some even demand—to be addressed as Dr. or Professor. Even my MD says, “Call me Marty.”
This may seem like a minor point. But I think it’s where Hunter fails its students. In the business world, people are not addressed with honorifics simply because they’ve been around for a while or do a particular job. No one gets special acknowledgment because they have had a particular amount of schooling. The goal, if not the reality, is to treat each other professionally and respectfully.
Whether the faculty believes it or not, part of their job is socializing the students. And they socialize students to be docile in the face of authority figures. In my experience, if two employees have the same educational background and one acts familiar and self-confident while the other says “Mister” or “Ms.” and waits his or her turn, the latter will be at a disadvantage in the business world.
Since the education isn’t second rate the students shouldn’t be conditioned to believe they are a lesser form of mortal. Sadly, this adherence to the traditions of the 19th century seems to suggest they are.
You can get a good education at Hunter—all the elements exist. But be advised the institution has little to teach its students about how to exist in the real world. And that’s not just a shame, it’s a failure.
Are you a student and about to sign the very first lease in your li... more→