The Massachusetts Institute of Technology
| StudentsReview ::
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Extra Detail about the Comment | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Educational Quality | B+ | Faculty Accessibility | F |
| Useful Schoolwork | A- | Excess Competition | F |
| Academic Success | A- | Creativity/ Innovation | F |
| Individual Value | F | University Resource Use | A- |
| Campus Aesthetics/ Beauty | D | Friendliness | F |
| Campus Maintenance | C | Social Life | F |
| Surrounding City | A- | Extra Curriculars | F |
| Safety | A- | ||
| Describes the student body as: Arrogant, Approachable, Broken Spirit, ClosemindedDescribes the faculty as: Arrogant, Condescending, Unhelpful, Self Absorbed | |||
| Lowest Rating Faculty Accessibility | F |
| Highest Rating Useful Schoolwork | A- |
Major: Economics (This Major's Salary over time)
the undergraduate experience for economics majors is terrible - the faculty consistently gets the lowest rankings on student surveys of teaching ability. it is not that the the professors are not great researchers - they are - many have won nobel prizes, etc. but their teaching ability leaves a LOT to be desired - moreover, they don't give a damn about undergrads - no matter how well you do in the department, it is often difficult to get meaningful UROPs with professors - they are too involved with their own research to care…the mit experience is in large part shaped by the department that you choose to major in - in this case, don't major in economics unless you are hell bent on a Phd - you're job options post graduation suck and the quality of your educational experience is limited (unless you enjoy teaching yourself all the material and doing a lot of independent research)