I
transferred to Hampshire for what I believed at the time
to be all the right reasons: the so-called experimental curriculum,
its politics, and the ability to do research as an
undergraduate. If my Division III (final thesis) helps me to
get into a good graduate school, then perhaps someday I
will eat some of these words. Going to Hampshire is
probably the worst decision I have ever made, and my
years here have been far and away the worst years
of my life. I have never felt as deeply let
down as I have during my time here. There are
a few good professors (about a third of them, I
would say), but that leaves two-thirds who are lazy or
incompetent. Every semester I have been saddled with classes taught
by nitwits who don't even seem to be doing their
own reading. Class is frequently boring and surprisingly awkward as
a result. Many of the teachers have political views that
can drive you insane. Hampshire is probably one of the
last strong bastions of political correctness in the nation. They
continuously trivialize serious oppression by absurd theorizing.
The biggest problem
at Hampshire, however, is the other students. What a bunch
of clowns. Most people at the school do little to
no work. I may be especially sensitive to this, as
I am majoring in a field related to literature. My
classes are crammed with hack poets who believe that their
muse excuses them from doing any real work or having
intellectual interests. I have been appalled in every way at
Hampshire, which has some novelty and was initially quite funny,
but has worn very thin over time. Even on the
Division IIIs, which are supposed to take all of senior
year and be some sort of crowning achievement, most students
find ways to do work that is not only unimpressive,
but juvenile. Last year, somebody has stitched together and displayed
some rather hideous creation, something like a psychedelic shag carpet
with a big text block in the middle, which used
the word “you're” when it should have said “your.” Somebody
earned a degree for that. I am ashamed that I
will one day have a Hampshire degree, because even though
my own work will be of fine quality, there will
be no means of distinguishing it. One only has to
read a few Div IIIs to get a sense for
how awful most of them are. People pay $40000 to
spend their senior year doing this instead of taking classes.
You're paying for your degree, not your education. Most students
leave you to wonder why they came to Hampshire in
the first place, because they do not seem to have
any special interest in the things that make Hampshire unusual.
They're largely just slackers, maybe with some deluded view about
how “alternative” they are. You will meet some very interesting
people as well, I must say, but they certainly don't
make it worth it.
All of this is made worse
by persistent bureaucratic problems, something which I understand to be
pretty universal at college, but which is no less excusable.
All of the “experimental” aspects at Hampshire end up being
disguised bureaucracy. Having a committee of teachers to advise is
worse than useless. Because there are so few really good
teachers relative to the entire faculty, many of the good
teachers are terribly overworked and will not have time for
you. Finding a committee becomes a nightmare, and one which
has no happy ending, as there is generally no reason
to consult them in the first place until you are
writing your Division III.
I would strongly discourage anyone who
has other good options from attending Hampshire. Not only is
it is a prison, but because of the grading system
it is considerably more difficult to transfer from than most
colleges. I read reviews of Hampshire on this site before
I decided to accept my admissions, and I foolishly disregarded
the negative things people have to say about the school
— they're all true. Don't make the same mistake as
I did.