(RPI) Poorly managed, poorly organized, and wholly unconcerned with student's

How this student rated the school

Research Quality	-	Research Availability	F
Research Funding	D	Graduate Politics	F
Errand Runners	-	Degree Completion	-
Alternative pay [ta/gsi]	F	Sufficient Pay	F
Competitiveness	-	Education Quality	C
Faculty Accessibility	C	Useful Research	F
Extracurriculars	-	Success-Understanding	-
Surrounding City	D+	Social Life/Environment	C
"Individual" treatment	C	Friendliness	C
Safety	-	Campus Beauty	C
Campus Maintenance	C	University Resource/spending	-

Describes the student body as: Friendly, Approachable Describes the faculty as: Helpful, Condescending, Unhelpful, Self Absorbed

Male

Lowest Rating Research Availability	F

Highest Rating Education Quality	C

He cares more about Research Availability than the average student.

Date: Dec 31 1969
Major: Other (This Major's Salary over time)
Poorly managed, poorly organized, and wholly unconcerned with student's careers and post-collegiate employment. My experience with RPI seriously set me back for years, and burdened me with an unreasonable amount of debt. STS especially is lacking in a real-world, let's-apply-that-education atmosphere. Go for a poly sci degree at a public univeristy, and you'll be getting twice the value at a third the cost.

Ask a Question or add a response!