The School of Visual Arts
StudentsReview ::
The School of Visual Arts - Extra Detail about the Comment | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Educational Quality | D | Faculty Accessibility | C |
Useful Schoolwork | C- | Excess Competition | C |
Academic Success | D- | Creativity/ Innovation | D+ |
Individual Value | F | University Resource Use | D |
Campus Aesthetics/ Beauty | D | Friendliness | C |
Campus Maintenance | B | Social Life | D+ |
Surrounding City | A+ | Extra Curriculars | D+ |
Safety | D- | ||
Describes the student body as: ApproachableDescribes the faculty as: Friendly |
Lowest Rating Individual Value | F |
Highest Rating Surrounding City | A+ |
Major: Fine Arts - Painting/Sculpture/Photography/etc (This Major's Salary over time)
Fine arts isn't what it used to be. The focus of the new Chairman is her own career advancement, not student well being. She overwhelmed a student facility with her own projects. Student complaints were ignored. I think that the real problem is that the school over-expanded. Student welfare seems to be bottom priority. A few teachers are outstanding, but there are too many lackluster classes.