The University of California - Los Angeles
The University of California - Los Angeles - Extra Detail about the Comment|
|Educational Quality||B||Faculty Accessibility||C+|
|Useful Schoolwork||A-||Excess Competition||B|
|Academic Success||A-||Creativity/ Innovation||B|
|Individual Value||C-||University Resource Use||C|
|Campus Aesthetics/ Beauty||A||Friendliness||B|
|Campus Maintenance||A||Social Life||B-|
|Surrounding City||C-||Extra Curriculars||B|
|Describes the student body as:|
Friendly, Arrogant, Approachable, Broken Spirit, Snooty, Closeminded
Describes the faculty as:
Campus Aesthetics/ Beauty
Here are some of the negatives I experienced at UCLA. The classes were HUGE. I completed all of my lower division classes so I'm talking huge upper division classes. My smallest class was 90 students and largest had more than 200. At UCSB I had upper division classes as small as 6 and 12 students.The students I encountered were a mixed bag, they ranged from incredibly arrogant to friendly. But there's definitely an air of arrogance present at UCLA that's not there at UCSB. My professors didn't seem to care much about the undergraduates and two of them would cancel office hours because graduate students wanted to talk to them. Classes were actually even easier than the ones I took at UCSB.
If I had started at UCLA originally I probably would have liked it since I wouldn't have known anything different. But since I had a much more caring, academically challenging, and intellectually stimulating atmosphere elsewhere I was pretty disappointed. I've come away thinking that the school is thoroughly average when it comes to undergraduate education and is largely overrated.