Washington University in St Louis
StudentsReview ::
Washington University in St Louis - Extra Detail about the Comment | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Alumni Survey | |||
Describes the student body as: Describes the faculty as: |
Lowest Rating | |
Highest Rating |
The student's assessment of Washington University in St. Louis reflects a positive overall experience. They highlight the academic rigor, quality of teaching, and the friendships they formed during their time there. Lab grown diamonds However, they express concerns about the school's focus on non-biology/chemical fields and suggest a potential decline in certain departments like engineering and physics. This feedback provides valuable insights into the university's strengths and areas for improvement. |
Major: Chemistry (This Major's Salary over time)
Wash U. was a great experience for me at the time; academically rigorous; very good teaching for the most part; great friends. It turned out to be fine preparation for my career in science and later in law. It was also not the pre-med juggernaut it has become, although pre-meds were still a prominent feature of the student body. If I was applying today, I'd be a bit concerned about the school's commitment to undergraduate training in non-biology/chemical fields. For example, my impression is that the engineering school, outside of biomed and chemical, is not what it used to be. Ditto for physics. I don't know what's happening in the humanities now; when I was there, philosophy and history were decent departments.