(OWU) There is no nice way to say it --

How this student rated the school

Educational Quality	F	Faculty Accessibility	B+
Useful Schoolwork	D+	Excess Competition	A-
Academic Success	D	Creativity/ Innovation	B-
Individual Value	B	University Resource Use	A-
Campus Aesthetics/ Beauty	D+	Friendliness	A
Campus Maintenance	F	Social Life	A+
Surrounding City	D-	Extra Curriculars	C-
Safety	A-

Describes the student body as: Arrogant, Snooty, Closeminded Describes the faculty as: Condescending, Self Absorbed

Female

ACT:32

id='quarter' class='snapshot' style='color: #970016; line-height:80px';float:left;

Super Brilliant

Lowest Rating Educational Quality	F

Highest Rating Social Life	A+

She cares more about Educational Quality than the average student.

Date: Feb 22 2004
Major: History/Histories (art history/etc.) (This Major's Salary over time)
There is no nice way to say it—this is a very low-quality school and has a very low-quality student body. Almost anyone can get accepted here, and hence there are lots of people who clearly don't belong in an academic setting. The school has a very poor reputation, and almost no one goes on to attend a prestigious graduate program. This place is fine for people who had a C average in high school, and whose sole ambition for college is to have a good time. The serious student should look elsewhere. And if you're REALLY smart, like a valedictorian or a National Merit Scholar, definitely don't go here. You will be bored and miserable. This is a school for underachievers, and is universally regarded as such.

Ask a Question or add a response!