(PCC) Graduate school here was much better than undergraduate, but

How this student rated the school

Research Quality	D	Research Availability	C
Research Funding	B	Graduate Politics	D
Errand Runners	D	Degree Completion	B
Alternative pay [ta/gsi]	A	Sufficient Pay	B
Competitiveness	D+	Education Quality	B
Faculty Accessibility	B	Useful Research	C
Extracurriculars	C	Success-Understanding	C-
Surrounding City	D	Social Life/Environment	F
"Individual" treatment	F	Friendliness	D-
Safety	B	Campus Beauty	A+
Campus Maintenance	A+	University Resource/spending	D-

Describes the student body as: Afraid, Broken Spirit Describes the faculty as: Arrogant

Male

Lowest Rating Social Life/Environment	F

Highest Rating Campus Beauty	A+

He cares more about Friendliness than the average student.

Date: Dec 31 1969
Major: Education (This Major's Salary over time)
Graduate school here was much better than undergraduate, but the lack of accreditation or national recognition is a MAJOR negative. There is an oppressive spirit on the campus where free-discourse of ideas, free-wheeling questions or even challenges for the sake of learning was not simply frowned upon, but you were threatened with expulsion if you "got outside the box." Teachers would only speak candidly "off the record" and there was a pervasive sensation of fear and intimidation everywhere. Emotionally/psychologically—this is not a healthy place. Absolutely fantastic facilities. Beautiful area. It is a shame that such a great campus is wasted on paranoia and control.

Ask a Question or add a response!